Define the journey
We agree on one core path, the user roles, test accounts, and what a successful release must allow users to do.
INDEPENDENT PRE-LAUNCH QA
Find the launch blockers before your users do.
A focused audit of your web app’s most important journey. Get reproducible issues, clear evidence, and a decision you can use before release.
One core journey · Up to two user roles · Findings in three business days after access
LAUNCHTRACE / SAMPLE REPORT01 — 03
RELEASE DECISION NO-GO
BLOCKING FINDING / DATA INTEGRITY
Reviews shown for the wrong product.
A page with zero visible reviews displayed eight reviews from another item. The report traced the source and recorded how to reproduce the mismatch.
01
Source page → parser → displayed result
Internal browser-extension audit, September 2026. Unpaid sample; product held back from sale.
One clear scopeStart with the flow that matters most.
Evidence you can act onExpected, actual, steps and screenshots.
An honest verdictShip, fix first, or test further.
01 / THE AUDIT
The last mile deserves its own pass.
Your team knows how the app is meant to work. An independent pass follows the user journey, changes roles and state, and records where the product does something else.
Test the edges
Check wrong-role access, missing or misleading data, empty and failed states, repeated actions, responsive behavior, and relevant console or network errors.
Deliver the verdict
Receive a prioritized issue log with reproduction steps, expected and actual results, evidence, and a go/no-go recommendation.
02 / SAMPLE WORK
The right finding can change a launch decision.
In an internal, unpaid audit of a browser extension, a product page with no visible reviews showed reviews from another product. The evidence linked source data, parsing and the displayed result. A targeted repair corrected that issue, while other misleading data and purchase failures kept the product off sale.
The sample shows how findings are documented. It is not a client testimonial or a claim of a successful launch.
Download the one-page audit sample03 / ENGAGEMENT
Start narrow. Fix what matters.
A first engagement is deliberately bounded so you can judge the quality of the findings before choosing any repair work.
INTRODUCTORY PILOT
Launch-blocker audit
$375 fixed
One existing web app, one buyer-defined core journey, up to two account roles, desktop and mobile viewports.
- Priority-ranked findings with reproduction steps
- Expected versus actual behavior and supporting evidence
- Clear launch recommendation
- Delivered within three business days after test access
AFTER TRIAGE
Repair & retest
Scope and price agreed after the audit.
Choose a bounded set of launch-blocking issues. I fix them in your repository or staging environment, then retest the changed flow and nearby behavior.
Initial repair engagements target around $950; the actual quote depends on the defects and access available.
Discuss a repair scopeThe pilot is functional QA, not a formal security, legal or compliance audit. No live payment test, destructive action or production release without your written approval. No promise of zero defects.
NEXT STEP
What’s the one flow you cannot afford to get wrong?
Send the app URL, planned launch timing and that critical user journey. No credentials are needed in the first email; we can agree on safe test access and scope afterward.